Matt Booher
Posts
When picking up ESPN: Some Guys Have All The Fun - you’re expecting an in-depth look into the world of ESPN and sports. On the ESPN thing, it delivers. But its not a sports book. It’s a business book. And a pretty damn good one to boot. So anyone interested in starting a company, running a successful company, or working for a high-profile company should give it a read. It’s worth the time and effort.
Authors Tom Shales and James Miller attribute ESPN’s rise to nine specific events, but more generally, three sections emerge: Bill Rasmussen’s efforts to sell ESPN to investors and the eventual power struggle that ensues once big money gets infused into the company; the key managerial decisions and cultural trends that created an environment for ESPN to become the leading sports network in the world; and the struggles a mature, highly visible organization has in maintaining its culture and identity in an increasingly scrutinized media landscape filled with high-priced, high-maintenance talent with a history of questionable behavior. Some highlights: the race against bankruptcy in the early days of ESPN and the eventual role Getty Oil plays in funding the start-up company; the vision behind SportsCenter and its eventual rise as a legitimate news reporting organization despite its “entertainment” roots; the contract negotiations with the NFL and MLB that ultimately legitimized the network in the eyes of the cable providers; the advertiser and cable subscriber dual revenue stream that allowed ESPN to aggressively compete against their network adversaries when bidding for television rights; the emergence of the internet and its impact on news gathering and news reporting operations; the myriad of behavorial incidents involving personalities both in front of and behind the cameras; and the cultural backlash encountered by ESPN once they become perched atop the sports scene. The “oral history” format makes for an awkward read at times. Narratives jump from perspective to perspective and the differing takes on a specific event can leave the reader wondering what really happened. However, it has a conversational tone and a fly-on-the-wall perspective that makes the book very engaging. You do feel like you’re sitting inside ESPN getting the insi de dope on some very public events.
Last week, I diligently prepared a post outlining what I believed to be statistical valid reasons why, when returning from injury, Seneca Wallace should get his starting job back and Jake Delhomme should not. Of course, none of this accounted for Colt McCoy. I’m glad I waited a week because McCoy must be named the Browns starting quarterback for the rest of the season.
The Browns plans for 2010 did not include McCoy. Simply put, Delhomme would start and Wallace would be the backup. The veterans would keep the quarterback seat warm while McCoy learned the nuances of the professional game. But injuries to both starters thrust McCoy into the spotlight and the rookie has played well in upset wins over New Orleans and New England. Even in a loss to Pittsburgh the rookie debutant looked poised and capable. For those who draft professional football’s unwritten rules, the notion that a starter cannot lose his job to injury seems to be one of the more interesting debates this season. The Browns, along with the Eagles earlier in the season, have become ground zero for that discussion. But if the guy winning the job has no previous track record, and his body of work exceeds that of his predecessors and is not simply the byproduct of a hot streak, it might be possible the replacement is simply a better player. And should get the starting nod. This is the case with Colt. Delhomme’s performance, not his injury, justifies benching. His four interceptions over six quarters matches the four interceptions both McCoy and Wallace have combined to throw in the other 30 quarters of Browns football. McCoy threw two in his debut in Pittsburgh and hasn’t thrown a pick since. Wallace had one each in a loss to Kansas City and a win over Cincinnati. In both games, Wallace’s QB rating was less than 80. Wallace did have QB ratings over 100 against both Baltimore and the second half against Atlanta. However, despite those promising performances, the Browns offense didn’t get it done. In the Atlanta game, Wallace’s pick was taken back for a score and essentially put the game to bed. McCoy’s numbers have been slightly less impressive. But in his games, the Browns have gone 2-2 against some of the toughest defenses in the game - Pittsburgh, New England, and New York. His late-game drive against the Jets differentiates him from Wallace. He put the Browns on his back and drove them down the field for the tying TD. When he got the ball back in OT, he was taking them down for the winning score. Chansi Stuckey’s fumble prevented another win, but simply put, the Browns quarterback didn’t give the game away. Based on historical trends with Browns QBs that is enough to warrant continued reps as the starter.
After the Heat's 88-80 loss to the Celtics last night, Lebron James might be overstating it just a bit when talking about how much talent the Heat really have. "It's a feel-out process," James said. "When you have so many options, it's something I'm not accustomed to, having that many threats out on the court at the same time."
Ignoring the slight at his former teammates, so many options and threats? Wade spent most of the second half on the bench, so beyond Chris Bosh and his massive 8 points, the options that needed sorting out are as follows: Joel Anthony, James Jones, Eddie House, Carlos Arroyo, Udonis Haslem, and Zydrunas Ilgauskas. Wow. I guess I overlooked his tendency for hyperbole when he played for the Cavaliers because we as fans wanted to believe the Cavalierswere better than advertised. With the Heat, the product will never match the advertisement. So the hyperbole simply sounds like a man
trying to convince himself this is a better basketball situation. The Heat will win because of the Big 3. Its how the NBA game works. But to tell yourself there were actually options last night against the Celtics would deny the obvious. LeBron was the best player on the floor last night. The Heat, however, were not the best team.
Enjoying a DVD of the browns opening day win over the steelers from 1989. We take it where we can get it.
Sent from my iPhone
Here we go Brownies. Here we go. On our way to Cleveland for the bus trip.
Sent from my iPhone
No single decision leads to catastrophic fail. Typically, its a series
of decisions, each made in an attempt to compensate for the previous
poor decision, that ultimately determine outcomes. For the Cleveland
Browns, the poor decisions made since 1999 continue to haunt. One game
won't fix everything. But Eric Mangini and the Browns coaching staff
must also recognize one play doesn't mean its broken.
interception and lack of carries for Peyton Hillis after his second
fumble did the Browns in today. Make no mistake, the interception and
the fumbles were inexcusable. But so was the collective shuttering of
the windows by the Browns on offense in an attempt to cling to the
slim 14-10 lead they established after a promising first 29 minutes of
football. I get it: protect Delhomme's fragile confidence, running
backs can't put the ball on the ground, this team still needs to learn
how to win. This team won't be anywhere near the playoffs anytime soon
playing like they did today. But they also won't get anywhere near the
playoffs if our game plan is to score a few and then try to hang on. Field position in the second half leaned substantially in the
Buccaneer's favor. And what did Cleveland do to try and change that?
Nothing. Nada. Unless check-downs and off-tackle runs count. Terry
Pluto called the Browns fragile. News to the Browns coaching staff:
the Browns aren't a priceless valuable you handle with care. They're a
young team hungry to win. Cut them loose. Last year's 1-11 start told
us everything we need to know about this team if you keep them tied
down.
Part of the visual slendor on our way across Ohio.
Sent from my iPhone
Mom was fixing McKenna's walker last night. Here she is waiting patiently.
Sent from my iPhone
I'm absolutely shocked and devastated to learn Martin O'Neill has left
Aston Villa this morning. I began work on my season preview last night
and now don't know what to do. At first, I thought we'd press for
5th...now we might be barely a top half team if we're slated to lose
James Milner and Ashley Young in the same summer as speculated. Let
the guessing begin.
The mariachi band was at El Pueblo tonight. McKenna getting down.
Sent from my iPhone
I haven't updated my blog in almost three months and I'm not starting
now just because I'm pissed off about the whole LeBron to Miami saga.
Let's just consider it a matter of coincidence since nothing can be
said about LeBron that hasn't been said about 15 times from an expert,
an insider, an opinionaire, or a clown.
over style. Authenticity over packaged image. But we were duped and
embarrassed. And we're pissed. And, yes, we'll get over it and move
on. But probably not as quickly as those with less skin in the game
would. Usually we're left to do this alone on our own time. So excuse
us while we vent, burn jerseys, and do anything else other than
discuss NBA basketball or the Miami Three. In fact, everyone else
should give it a shot - the experts, the insiders, the opinionaires,
the clowns. Express an opinion that reaches beyond a sound bite. Stop
telling others how to feel. It'll make you less of a prick. Moving on...
On the eve of the 2010 NBA Playoffs, I thought it would be fun to sit down and take a statistical look at the first round matchups. A few fellow Cavs fans have been asking me if we have anything to fear in Chicago, and of course being a Cleveland sports fan, its impossible to not be terrified at the prospect of suffering a stunning first round loss in a season were Cleveland look likely candidates for a NBA title. So I decided to play with some numbers to put the collective fears into context and also see if there are any other first round matchups worth tuning in. This is especially important in Ohio where the games in the intensely competitive Western Conference will be decided after midnight. Gotta see if the loss of sleep gets rewarded with some awesome basketball. Note: The two tools I've used to generate these predictions are not my own. First, Jeff Sagarin's NBA Ratings available at http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/nba0910.htm serve as the team power ratings. Second, I've repurposed Wayne Winston's spurscavs82.xls model from his book Mathletics. His website can be found at http://www.waynewinston.com. I've used these tools becuase both authors made them available, however, I want to be clear they are not mine nor is my intent to portray them as mine. So on to the analysis: Eastern Conference(1) Cleveland Cavaliers vs (8) Chicago Bulls - Cleveland 91% chance to win series
On paper, this series appears to be the biggest mismatch of all the first round matchups. But Chicago and Cleveland tied the regular season series at 2-2 and while it is likely Cleveland will move on to the second round, it may not be the easy four-game sweep many Cavs fans expect. (2) Orlando Magic vs (7) Charlotte Bobcats - Orlando 85% chance to win series
The defending Eastern Conference champion Orlando Magic will more than likely find their way into the second round as playoff debutantes Charlotte prepare for the franchise's first ever playoff series. Orlando's talent and inside presence will prove too much for the pesky Bobcats. (3) Atlanta Hawks vs (6) Milwaukee Bucks - Atlanta 72% chance to win series
Milwaukee earned a surprise spot in the NBA Playoffs and a matchup with Atlanta, a team looking to find a way to get deeper into the playoffs after coming up short last season. Atlanta will get a shot at division rival Orlando in the second round since the Bucks will be without starting center Andrew Bogut. (4) Boston Celtics vs (5) Miami Heat - Boston 61% chance to win series
This series holds all the star power as Garnett, Pierce, and Allen faceoff against Dwayne Wade in a compelling first round matchup. But like the other first round matchups in the Eastern Conference, the higher seed will hold, setting up an even more exciting second round contest with the Cleveland Cavaliers. Western Conference(1) Los Angeles Lakers vs (8) Oklahoma City Thunder - Los Angeles 65% chance to win series
I know, this sounds crazy, but the Thunder are much better than most realize. In the Western Conference, earning the eighth seed and a matchup with the defending champs doesn't feel like much of a reward, but this might just be the must-see series of the first round. Phil Jackson's recent outbursts against the officiating and Kevin Durant might just prove prescient...I think the Zen Master knows Kobe and crew are in for a fight. (2) Dallas Mavericks vs (7) San Antonio Spurs - San Antonio 51% chance to win series
Shocking. The Mavericks clearly have been the second best team in the Western Conference all season, but not even home court advantage gives Dallas a boost to overcome San Antonio. This matchup certainly speaks to the parity out West, because after running the model 10,000 times, the Spurs still earned the slight edge thanks to some rounding up. (3) Phoenix Suns vs (6) Portland Trailblazers - Phoenix 63% chance to win series
The model doesn't account for the recent injury to Brandon Roy, but nonetheless, the Suns should be able to dispatch Portland with a solid effort. Portland did battle hard in the ultra-competitive Northwest Division while Phoenix bested weaker Pacific foes in Sacramento, the Clippers, and Golden State, but Phoenix has a bit more experience. (4) Denver Nuggets vs (5) Utah Jazz - Utah 51% chance to win series
Denver has been the trendy pick to oust the Lakers from atop the Western Conference perch for two seasons now but they'll be lucky to get out of the first round matcup with divison rival Utah. Despite the identical records and Denver earning home court, Utah looks to have a slight edge in getting at the Lakers in the next round. The Western Conference clearly has the more exciting matchups as the bottom four seeds are much stronger than the bottom four seeds in the East. The playoffs in the East won't get going until the second round whereas the first round out West will be make or break for every team other than the Lakers and Suns. If you're inclinded to gamble...putting a few bucks on the Jazz and Spurs while parlaying the top 4 in the East might turn out to be a decent investment.
Started toying with Tableau Public this evening and conducted a small fantasy baseball analysis to get a feel for the software and service. It's a simple scatterplot with groupings by position ranked by total points scored last season. I hope to expand upon it as I learn how to do more with Tableau Public, but in the short term, it's a helpful visualization so you can quickly see the marginal value of certain positions and performers.
First basemen clearly lead the scoring thanks to Albert Pujols, Prince Fielder, and Ryan Howard top scorers. Third base stands out as surprisingly weak with Mark Reynolds and Evan Longoria tops at the position. Check it out and let me know what you think. Sheet 1Updates
-
Chicken. (@ Raising Cane's) http://t.co/1L2PKi20
-
Waw. (@ Ohio State Bar Association w/ 9 others) http://t.co/mJRDO4sk
-
Effective analytics is disruptive http://t.co/NotOvHYI - this cuts at questions regarding an org's readiness to tackle analytics
-
Ixda. Cool presentation from hobsons (@ Lavomatic) http://t.co/OK49mCku
-
1/3 of display not viewed. I think its poor site design leading to poor placements. thoughts? http://t.co/2DAaybgo via @mediapost
-
Just downloaded #tableau 7 this morning. "ooooh, that's a nice dashboard" #stuffdatageekssay9 days ago from web | Reply, Retweet, Favorite
-
I'm at IHOP (7748 Cox Ln, Tylersville, West Chester) http://t.co/RBWr0JUH
-
I'm at Buffalo Wild Wings (11363 Montgomery Rd, at E Kemper Rd, Cincinnati) http://t.co/WoGl7t7N
-
@dwhit110 is your avatar the ballerinas shirt fom dodgeball?
-
I'm at Symmes Township Library (11850 Enyart Road, Montgomery, Loveland) http://t.co/XGZhN1kH
-
Love the jalepeno bagel. (@ Everything Bagels) http://t.co/VDhagkCe
-
I'm at Sheraton on Capitol Square (75 E State St, Columbus) w/ 4 others http://t.co/xo9VGNsZ
-
I'm at Sheraton on Capitol Square (75 E State St, Columbus) w/ 5 others http://t.co/MmxGN27m
-
I'm at Holy Family Parish (584 W. Broad Street, N. Skidmore Street, Columbus) w/ 3 others http://t.co/jDPXvsmV
-
I'm at Brazenhead (1027 W 5th Ave, Columbus) http://t.co/AZLCw9P1
-
I'm at Sheraton on Capitol Square (75 E State St, Columbus) http://t.co/P2xLGrsj
-
Rehersal then dinner. (@ Holy Family Parish) http://t.co/MZBqwV4P
-
I'm at Raising Cane's (1944 Stringtown Rd, Grove City) http://t.co/q2GGqCZs
-
I just unlocked the "Explorer" badge on @foursquare! http://t.co/TUQ9eMa6
-
Doing my best to avoid another red card (@ Wall2Wall Soccer) http://t.co/Sw7giK8t
Posts
Shared by brownsvillan
Disappointed to see Friedel leaving to play second fiddle. Villa must have made it very clear he is not wanted.
Brad Friedel will re-join Liverpool after rejecting offers from West Bromwich Albion and Aston Villa to remain in the Midlands. The veteran keeper has agreed a two-year deal.
On Premier League Survival Sunday, how many times during the 90 minutes do you think the league table will change near the bottom of the table? Depending on which teams score and when, the league table positions of the five teams battling to avoid...
This is a content summary. Visit http://www.epltalk.com for full contents! Want the full RSS feed? Visit http://www.epltalk.com/epl-talk-pro-faq/ to learn more.
During March, though my heart and mind are largely invested in college basketball, I take frequent glances at the NHL standings to see how playoff race is shaping up.
Unfortunately the NHL standings, which are determined by points rather than winning percentage, don’t always tell us which teams are in the best position to earn a playoff spot.
The Problem
The NBA and Major League Baseball—the other pro leagues in which teams play a bunch of games—use winning percentage to rank teams. Winning percentage is a simple stat: number of wins divided by total number of games played. It says nothing about strength of schedule and makes no distinction between home games and road games.
But in sports, where winning a division or qualifying for the post-season depend entirely on how many games a team wins, it makes sense. And since at any point in the season teams will have played different numbers of games, winning percentage shows us which teams are best positioned to win their division or clinch a post-season berth.
If Team A is 25-13 and Team B is 26-17, winning percentage tells us to rank A (.657) ahead of B (.634), even though B has more wins.
Winning percentage doesn’t work in hockey because the NHL ranks teams according to points, not wins. The “PCT” we look for in baseball and basketball wouldn’t tell the whole story in hockey since teams also earn points for overtime losses. But during the season ranking teams according to points earned (2 for a win, 1 for an overtime loss) isn’t sufficient either. When some teams have played 74 games, while others have played 72, 73, 75, or 76, ranking teams by points gives a distorted picture of how the teams stack up.
Late last week (as I was thinking about this), the Kings and Predators each had 90 points; the Blackhawks had 88. The teams were ranked 5, 6, and 7, respectively, in the Western Conference standings. Here’s the problem: Nashville had played 75 games; L.A. had played 74; Chicago had played 73. While the Preds were two points ahead of the Blackhawks, they’d had two more opportunities to earn points.
How to Fix the NHL Standings
The NHL needs a better way to rank teams.
If you figured points per game (PPG) for the three teams above, the Kings (1.216) would be slightly ahead of the Blackhawks (1.205), who would be slightly ahead of the Preds (1.200). PPG is similar to winning percentage in that it gives an overall assessment of a team’s performance regardless of the number of games that team has played. But something doesn’t feel right about ranking hockey teams according to a number between 0 and 2. 1.216 and 1.205 look weird and unfamiliar.
That’s OK. We can derive two more comfortable statistics from PPG.
One is percentage of total points (PTP): points earned divided by the maximum number of points a team could have earned (2 times the number of games played). Another way to arrive at PTP is PPG/2. PTP gives us numbers between 0 and 1 that are similar to winning percentages in other sports. The PTPs for the Kings, Blackhawks, and Preds late last week were .608, .603, and .600 respectively.
The other statistic is Projected Points (PRO), the number of points a team would be expected to have at the end of the season if they were to maintain their present pace. PRO is PPG times 82, the number of games in a season. The PROs for last week’s Kings, Blackhawks, and Preds were 99.73, 98.85, and 98.40, respectively.
Either one of these simple statistics would give hockey fans a better idea of how their teams stack up, especially during March, when teams are jockeying for Playoff position.
Here is a look at the latest Western Conference standings, sorted by PTP and PRO. Notice that Los Angeles and Nashville jump Phoenix, and Chicago gains a slight edge over Anaheim:
It is not easy to pull off upsets in the NCAA tournament. Despite claims that there is more parity in college basketball this season, the first two rounds of this season’s tournament did not provide any more upsets than last year. (The average seed of the remaining 16 teams is exactly the same as last year.) However, there was perhaps one less upset than there could have been because one coach turned down a terrific opportunity to tilt the playing field in his team’s favor.
After San Diego State’s Malcolm Thomas converted a three-point play with two minutes left in overtime, Temple had the basketball with the score tied 61-61. In any upset bid, a team needs some things to go its way, and the following sequence would be extremely beneficial to the Owls’ chances of winning. Temple would work the clock until a questionable foul was called on the Aztecs’ Kawhi Leonard with six seconds left on the shot clock and the Owls in no position to get off a decent shot.
Amazingly, the Owls were not yet in the bonus, and so the foul didn’t result in foul shots, but a shot-clock reset for Temple with 1:33 left. Again, Temple would work the clock, taking a shot with 1:08 left. The shot missed and two San Diego State players had the best opportunity to secure the rebound. Neither was aware of the other’s presence however, and the resulting effort caused the ball to go out of bounds. Temple would get yet another new shot clock.
In a game of blackjack, you can make money as a player, but you need some breaks. It helps if the dealer busts more than usual. It’s nice if you get a bunch of face cards. Fran Dunphy had been the player for 44 minutes against the dealer, second-seeded, undefeated-against-everybody-but-BYU San Diego State, and he had done pretty well. Anybody that can sit at a blackjack table for two hours and break even has been a bit fortunate. But now Dunphy had the opportunity to be the dealer. The shot clock is 35 seconds. There were 66 seconds remaining. If Temple could get a shot off in about 15 seconds, they would force San Diego State to take a shot with enough time left for Temple to get another possession with plenty of time left on the clock.
In fairness, the Aztecs could have rebounded their own missed shot and not given Temple the opportunity for a final possession, but the odds against that happening are significantly in Temple’s favor. Besides, it’s not like Temple would have had to operate outside its comfort zone to get a shot off in 15 seconds. The Owls’ average possession time on the season was 16 seconds. And this possession would have started in the frontcourt, so Temple could have run a called play immediately after the throw-in. Fran Dunphy could have called a timeout, drawn up a play and become the dealer. But he didn’t.
Not only did the Owls not attempt to score quickly, they milked the clock again. Ultimately, they would wait and begin to run a play with about ten seconds to shoot, limiting their chance to get a good shot. If they were planning to run a ten-second play, it clearly made more sense to do so at the beginning of the shot clock than at the end. Temple would miss a shot, and San Diego State would do the same, and so the game went to double overtime where the Aztecs pulled out the victory. It’s not that Dunphy’s decision cost Temple the game. We can’t say that any more than we can guarantee the dealer will win his next hand of blackjack. But those kinds of less-than-optimal decisions reduced the chance of an upset.
It was interesting that only a few minutes after the conclusion of this game that a similar opportunity would present itself to Brad Stevens, the head coach of Butler, who was trailing top-seeded Pitt by one point late in the game. Stevens is the patron saint of analytical coaches, so when Butler gained possession of the basketball with 1:03 remaining it was not surprising that Stevens accepted the opportunity to be the dealer.
After calling timeout, Stevens drew up a play for his team that would take only a few seconds. As in the Temple game, Butler and Pitt would trade empty possessions at this point. However, because Butler’s play used so little time, the Bulldogs got the ball back with nine seconds left after Pitt’s missed shot. It was the bonus possession that Temple should have had at the end of overtime. Butler converted their opportunity and would go onto win the game (but not before some unusual end-game drama you may have heard about).
Underdogs work all game for the opportunities that were presented to Temple and Butler on Saturday. One coach took advantage of the chance to be dealer, and the other didn’t. Just like at the blackjack table, the dealer usually wins. It’s a shame Temple’s players were not given an opportunity they, like Butler’s players, had worked all game to deserve.
If anyone doubted Colt McCoy’s leadership and passion for his craft, I’m sure their minds have been changed over the past two months. But you wouldn’t have, not if you watched him play for four years at the University of Texas.
One of our commenters – Du – pointed us in the direction of an interview McCoy gave coming off the field after last year’s National Championship loss to the Alabama. In that game, Colt was knocked out in the first quarter with a shoulder injury and was unable to return in the biggest game of his life.
The honesty and candor he gives are incredible. Just a straight up class act. How can you not love this kid? Watch and enjoy.
Turner Sports has relaunched NCAA.com with plans to make it a year-round destination for college sports fans and provide coverage for all 88 NCAA championships.
The new NCAA.com will provide users with editorial coverage of all men’s and women’s NCAA sports during the regular season and championships, with school-specific content for more than 1,000 NCAA institutions. Exclusive live video streaming will be featured on the site from more than 60 NCAA championships as well as video highlights from all 88 championships
“We look forward to leveraging our experiences in managing some of the most popular sports sites on the Internet toward growing NCAA.com into the top digital college sports destination,” said Matthew Hong, senior vice president & general manager, sports operations at Turner Sports.
Additional features of NCAA.com include:
*Original content focused on student-athletes: The site will include weekly pieces that focus on the student-athletes off the field; video interviews with coaches, administrators and student-athletes.
*Facebook and Twitter: The site will offer social media functionality from Facebook and Twitter, including a collection of the best tweets of the week from student-athletes, coaches and fans and uploaded content from Facebook pages.
*Online merchandise, photo store and tickets: Fans can purchase their officially licensed team and championship merchandise from the official NCAA online store (NCAA.com/store ).
Knutsen, Naudascher find closure
"Yesterday, almost nine years after 13-year-old Brittanie Cecil died after being struck by a hockey puck, Naudascher finally met the man who had been carrying around his own anguish for the loss of her little girl.
Espen Knutsen, the former Columbus Blue Jackets player who shot the puck that struck Brittanie, embraced the trembling mother the moment he saw her, and the two began the closure that had escaped them both."
This story covers the emotional meeting between Knutsen and Naudascher. Its a shame that so many made Knutsen look like a bad guy because of a fluke accident. I'm glad to hear that there are no ill feelings toward anyone after what happened that night almost nine years ago. This is a great heart-warming story.
There are several different ways to voice displeasure. The freedom of protest allows Americans to come together and collectively express, promote, pursue and/or defend common interests.
But rather than standing outside with a picket sign – it’s pretty cold out there, after all – one unhappy season-ticket holder has decided to voice his displeasure via the sponsorship block on the Cleveland Cavaliers page at Basketball-Reference.com.
Recently upped for one full year, this “ticked off” season ticket holder apparently opted to use his/her $20 and 255-character maximum to voice his disdain for team majority owner Dan Gilbert.
You have clicked on the Basketball-Reference.com page featuring the flotsam of the worst owner in professional sports, the Napoleonic carnival barker dwarf, Dan Gilbert. Compared to Dan Gilbert, Ted Stepien was a freakin’ genius.
Stepien, as you may recall, was touted as the owner of the “worst and most poorly-run franchise in all of basketball” back in 1982. He had fired Joe Tait (now a Hall-of-Fame announcer), threatened to move the team to Toronto, and tore through five different head coaches in two years of ownership.
Stepien is also the man behind the “Ted Stepien Rule,” forbidding teams from trading away consecutive first-round draft selections, something that allowed the Cavaliers to lose an NBA record 24 straight games in front of a season average of 3,900 fans at the Richfield Coliseum.
He did, however, introduce Cleveland to a dance team, likely evolving into what is now known as the Cavalier Girls – perhaps, the deciding factor in the season ticket holder’s mind to place him ahead of Gilbert amidst his list of best Cleveland franchise owners.
But that’s not all.
Also receiving a bit of shrapnel from who is likely the same season ticket holder was none other than JJ Hickson.
Boom, roasted.
One of my biggest NFL pet peeves (and I have many) will be on display this weekend as each of the two prime-time games will include a team that played in a prime-time game last weekend.
The Dallas Cowboys and Indianapolis Colts were featured on Sunday and Monday nights in Week 2. In Week 3 they'll both stay in prime time but swap days, with the Colts heading to Arizona for Sunday Night Football and Dallas hosting its second straight prime-time game on Monday Night Football against Carolina.
This is annoying, repetitive and unnecessary. Figuring out the schedule isn't easy, given the interests of four networks and fairness and all that junk, but it's not that difficult to put different teams on NBC and ESPN every week.
It would be in the general interest of everyone (except the TV networks, which is precisely why this practice is employed). For casual fans, it's no fun to watch the same team on a national telecast two straight weeks. (It's bad enough I have to see the Ravens play every week because somebody decided D.C. and Baltimore are dual markets. Now I'm being force-fed close-ups of Jerry Jones in consecutive weeks?) For fans of the teams playing it's not much better. Prime-time games are fun, but in small doses. Few people want to stay up late two straight weeks while having to endure the misery of waiting through the afternoon games for your squad to play.
The good news is that the Colts/Cowboys double-up is the last we'll see until December. Unlike last year when back-to-backs cluttered much of the first two months of the season, there will be no more in '09 until after Thanksgiving. After that there are four planned, but because of the flexible SNF schedule none of those are set in stone.
Here's the full list of back-to-back prime-time games for 2009.
Dallas Cowboys -- Week 2/3 (Sunday night vs. New York Giants, Monday night vs. Carolina)
Indianapolis Colts -- Week 2/3 (Monday night at Miami, Sunday night at Arizona)
New England Patriots -- Week 12/13 (Monday night at New Orleans, Sunday night at Miami*)
New York Giants -- Week 14/15 (Sunday night vs. Philadelphia*, Monday night at Washington)
Washington Redskins -- Week 15/16 (Monday night vs. New York Giants, Sunday night vs. Dallas*)
Minnesota Vikings -- Week 15/16 (Sunday night vs. Carolina*, Monday night at Chicago)
* Game could be moved because of flex scheduling
Anyone turned off by the hype placed on the kids at the Little League World Series might find some solace in this live microphone catching a young hurler asking for permission to hit a batter. Yay, for all-access!
Baseball is supposed to teach youngsters the value of teamwork and fair play. But sometimes the game is just so damn frustrating that all you want to do is drill some kid in the back with a fastball. Mercer Island's Brandon Lawler certainly understood that after allowing the tying and go-ahead runs to score in the top of the sixth (and final) inning against Georgia—an inning that included three wild pitches and two passed balls. His coach came out to talk him down, but Lawler was not in the mood.
COACH: "Hey, we're going to come up again."
PITCHER: "Is it okay if I just hit this batter?"
COACH: "What? No. No. Are you kidding me? ... Let's get this guy. Come on. We're still in this game. One-run game. You wanna stay in?"
PITCHER: "No."
COACH: "You wanna come out right now?"
PITCHER: "Yes, I do. Can I sit out?"
COACH: "No, you're going to first base."
Now I know a lot of people are going to get down on this kid for pouting and quitting on his team, but you know what? I guarantee you that more than few big leaguers have acted even more childish and pissy than this when on the mound. And it's hard not to sympathize with a 12-year-old who just messed up the biggest moment of his life in front of a national TV audience. Sometimes sportsmanship can go take a fucking hike.
Little Leaguer shows sportsmanship, heart in defeat [Stupid Sports Blog]
Warner Robins Rallies in Sixth [Little League]
The 10 hours of video uploaded every minute to YouTube could be a problem for Google’s infrastructure. Video files are fat and people don’t want to wait long once they press play, which means keeping them requires a trade-off between fast access and cheap storage. A range of companies are trying to address these sorts of storage problems through compression, caching and even Flash memory in the data center. But since you can’t cache everything, the recent study from Tubemogul, which shows that online videos get the most views in the first three days (with the peak demand occurring on Day Three), can help set caching policies. Dropping a video from the cache after 11 days would mean only half of the video’s viewers would be tormented with a slightly slower upload time.
Photos
Posts
I stumbled across an interesting article on Hardball Talk the other day titled 'A wonderfully sensible realignment and optimization plan' that focused on how baseball might improve its scheduling and the resulting competitive imbalance problems inherent with its asinine unbalanced schedule and divisional alignments. As a guy focused on helping companies optimize its given resources, I find this proposal compelling and exciting. First, a quick review of the proposal:
MLB: Should Wins Be Considered a Stat? - Sabermetricians will tell you that when it comes to pitchers, winning isn't everything. Easy for them to say. http://sports.espn.go.com/insider/news/story?id=6284300
Wins seems to be a stat of attribution which we know becomes flawed since it's dependent on the performance of others. A stat that considers not losing might be compelling. Another could consider the delta between team outcomes and the partial contribution starters make to those outcomes - both positive and negative.NHL: Next Level - The nerds are coming to hockey, and they have the NHL's lame stats in their sights.
http://sports.espn.go.com/insider/news/story?id=6278232Grading on a Curve - Which of the four major sports gets the most value from its draft? The results may surprise you. http://sports.espn.go.com/insider/news/story?id=6284379
I found this article on ESPN The Magazine for iPad.
True Grit - The Wonderlic is that standard for assessing a draftee's IQ. But fortitude, not smarts, is what makes a great football player.
http://sports.espn.go.com/insider/news/story?id=6292833
Now that baseball season has begun, the daily ritual of checking the baseball standing begins. A couple of months ago, FanGraphs shared some ideas on how to rethink the standings for Major League Baseball. A few compelling suggestions were shared.
I think there three key perspectives must be accommodated when reconstructing the baseball standings:1. A simple view to see how well each team sits relative to .500.2. A relative view to see how far back/ahead each team stands from the division leader.
3. A broader view inclusive of all teams to determine position relative to Wild Card race.
Every morning when I was a kid, I would wake up and grab the sports pages to see how my team was doing. Millions of people across the country do the same — they wake up and reach for a paper to sift through something like this:
I always go straight for my division and my team, and see how many games behind they are. I then look longingly at the Wild Card standings to get an idea of how far behind they are. But most of the information gets completely ignored as I eat my breakfast. I’m guessing that millions of people across the country are doing the same.
Chris Spurlock over at Beyond the Box Score made a noble attempt to animate a division race here. But a few things didn’t sit well with me. First of all, it was out of context — you can see how your team is doing in comparison to the division leader, but not in relation to the rest of the league.
My suggestion was this:
But I still have the same problem. It shows how each team is doing in relation to the AL East, but how is the rest of the AL doing? Not to mention that it looks almost exactly like the graphs Studes used to update on The Hardball Times. Though that isn’t a bad thing, it also means that I didn’t add anything at all to the conversation.
So I got thinking even harder about it. What do we really want to see in the standings? We want to know how our team is doing. We want to know how far behind they are in the division. We want to know how they are doing in relation to the other teams in the league when it comes to the Wild Card Standings. Also, we probably want to see what direction they’re headed in. Some newspapers show the record over the last 10 games and/or the current streak (3L, or 4W, etc.). Studes created sparklines to do the same thing.
This is my attempt at making the divisional race better (the file is 6 megabytes, so please give it a little bit of time to load):
Each division is on the same graph, so we can compare across the entire AL in a glance. Whoever is furthest left in their division is in first. Each team also has a “trail” of 5 days to show what direction they are moving in. When a line pops up between two teams, it means that they have changed places in the standings.
Unlike my usual graphs, this was made entirely in Excel, and then was turned into a .gif file, so the image quality isn’t so great. Please be understanding. I also don’t handle ties too well, and don’t show which team is actually first in the Wild Card race.
I want your feedback. Does this graph work for you? Would looking at a chart like this every morning with your coffee be a good replacement for the traditional standings?
Testing the blog design with an opening post. This is interesting.
Putting some more information into the post to see how this will display. Still wondering how well the post@posterous.com interface works. I need to iron out the bugs on that. Whew!
Posts
Sometimes its hard to see past the “smartest-guys-in-the-room” vibe the Tribe’s front office gives off. Case in point? When everyone, from the team’s manager to the casual observer, believes the Indians need additional offensive firepower to compete with Detroit and Chicago for the AL Central, Cleveland’s leadership swims upstream and deals its top two pitching prospects for another pitcher and not a middle-of-the-order bat.
And when asked about it, Cleveland president Mark Shapiro breaks out the corporate speak on Twitter and tells fans the deal was a “rare and unique opportunity to acquire a front-of-the-rotation starter with multiple years of control.”
Read: This guy is good value. Also read: This trade isn’t about 2011.
When reviewing the trade from a short-term perspective, ESPN’s Keith Law nails it.
“The main problem for Cleveland here is that it is incorrectly evaluating its own team…Since a fluky 30-15 start…Cleveland is 23-36 and has been outscored by 77 runs in that span — that is, it has been outscored by over a run and a quarter per game. Superman isn’t going to close that gap, and while there are things to like about Ubaldo Jimenez, Superman he ain’t.”
True. Jimenez is not Superman. But his performance and WAR tied to salary the two previous seasons would have cost the Indians $25 million per season on the free agent market. Even his lackluster 2011 would cost Cleveland around $11 million. In 2012 and 2013 Jimenez will cost Cleveland $4.2 million and $5.75 million respectively. That’s good value. And that’s important given the Indians nearly non-existent track record in ponying up for talent with the Dolan’s limited budget.
But another look at the trade shows something else - Cleveland will have Jimenez, Fausto Carmona, and Justin Masterson under contract through 2013. They will also have Travis Hafner, Asdrubal Carbrera, and Shin-Soo Choo tied up through 2013. That’s a strong nucleus. Alex White and Drew Pomeranz, the two central prospects surrendered by the Tribe in the deal, may or may not be ready to contribute on a significant level in 2013. Throw in the developing Lonnie Chisenhall, Jason Kipnis, and a strong bullpen and Cleveland fully intends to begin contending now and for the next two full seasons. Perhaps that game-changing bat can come this winter.
Remember when J.J. Hickson and Zydrunas Ilgauskas were too steep a price to pay for Amare Stoudamire? And now the Cavs have Omri Casspi. My times have changed in Cleveland.
I’m not sure where it all came off the rails with Hickson, but his inconsistency was maddening and more and more the effort was not there on defense. Hickson is not a smooth and fluid ballplayer. He has to work hard to get his shot and his value was in offensive rebounds and hustle around the basket. If he’s dogging it, he’s just taking up space - preventing others from getting to the rim and a clear liability on defense. When he was on the floor, the Cavs surrendered an additional 6.8 points per 100 possessions. In an increasingly numbers-driven basketball world, negative stats like this can be crippling. Increasingly so for a guy with a body built to defend in the NBA.
He still has the potential to be a very good player in the NBA, particularly if the effort and attention is there. Take nothing away from his skills but its clear he was not ready for the post-LeBron era and the additional responsibility that came with it.
Cavs fans aren’t necessarily disappointed in the Hickson trade because of what they lost but in not understanding what they’ve gained. Casspi remains a relatively unknown quantity aside from his place in history as the first Israeli-born player in the NBA. According to John Hollinger’s PER (Player Efficiency Rating), Casspi’s PER of 11.76 is less than Hickson’s slightly above average 15.67 (an average player in the NBA gets a 15.00 and Dirk Nowitzki rates a 23.52). Even with the conditional first-rounder thrown in, this trade still favors the Kings.
But this trade was not based on past performance. Casspi projects as a solid starting small forward in the NBA and that was not going to happen in Sacramento with the majority of the possessions going to Tyreke Evans, DeMarcus Cousins, and Marcus Thorton. The thinking is Casspi is on the cusp of breaking out and becoming a 16-8-type guy from the small forward position. Given the Cavs were outproduced at the SF position by 6.6 points (16.6 PER for opponents vs 10.0 PER for Cleveland), the loss of production from Hickson should be mitigated with the play of Tristan Thompson at PF and Omri Casspi at SF. Even average performances from the two should compensate for the marginal value of J.J. Hickson.
The All-Star discussion in baseball is just plain stupid. Without even addressing the silliness of the game itself and its implications on World Series home-field advantage, we should accept the fact that the fans will not select an optimal roster for both the American and National Leagues and rather opt for seeing the players they want to see. Its their perogative and I’m fine with it. There is no guarantee the baseball cognoscenti will get it right either, especially with the differing opinions between traditional baseball minds and statistically-driven sabermetric crowd. And I’m not going into that debate here.
But after ruminating on how useless the entire discussion has become, I stumbled across an article that at least attempts to offer an intelligent discussion on Who is An All-Star? The article, from Basement-Dwellers.com (a blog I just discovered today and highly recommend for Reds fans) three potential ways to view the All-Star selection: true overall talent, previous 162-game performance, or first-half performance. What’s interesting about the analysis is how infrequently the different methods provide that same all-star at the same positions.
In the American League: Josh Hamilton, Jose Bautista, and Curtis Granderson could be considered unanimous All-Stars. In the National League, its Matt Holiday. In only one scenario, the National League previous 162-game method does an Indians or Reds player make the cut - Joey Votto’s previous 162 game performance exceeds that of Albert Pujols in terms of pure talent and Prince Fielders first half of 2011.
Despite what feels like drastically opposite starts, the Indians and Reds have similar playoff prospects as the season approaches the All-Star Game break. Cleveland’s pleasantly suprising quick start has the Tribe perched atop the AL Central with a 45-38 record and slim leads over the Tigers and White Sox. Cincinnati’s frustrating mediocrity has them at 43-43 and in fourth place in the NL Central but only three games behind the leading St. Louis Cardinals. According to the compelling and data-rich site Cool Standings, both the Indians and Reds can be considered contenders for their respective division titles.
The Indians have a 47.1% chance of winning the division. Thanks to the money-loaded AL East, the Wild Card is all but certain to come from that division leaving the Indians with the Central Division title as the main route to the playoffs. And with 38 games against Chicago, Detroit, and Minnesota remaining on the schedule, the Indians sit in the drivers seat for what should be an exciting run to October. While it may seem obvious, one thing working for the Indians is their ability to keep opponents off the scoreboard. Between the Indians, Tigers, and White Sox, only the Indians are the only team of that plus-.500 group that has given up fewer runs than they’ve scored.
The Reds, despite their fourth-place position, still have a 27.9% chance of reaching the postseason. Four teams have an approximate 25% chance of winning the NL Central, so despite the troubling start, the Reds are far from out of the race. A single six or seven-game winning streak could deliver the division. Simiar to the AL, the NL wildcard will most likely come from the East. With 50 of its remaining 76 games to be played against division rivals, the Reds have a tremendous opportunity to take control of the division in the second half of the season. Cincinnati and St. Louis seem to be the only two teams in the divisional race that will be able to consistently topple their opponents as both Pittsburgh and Milwaukee are scoring and giving up runs at a similar clip.
For both Ohio teams, the division races are winnable.
Hockey’s return from the South to Winnipeg is not just good for Canada and their efforts to reclaim their national pastime. It’s also potentially good news for the Columbus Blue Jackets. As talk about NHL realignment intensifies, most Blue Jackets fans feel a move to the Eastern Conference could be a much needed boost to a franchise struggling to keep its fans and attract revenues.
But, in typical hockey fashion, NHL brass is now looking for a fix to a problem it created. It’s never been about alignment of the conferences and divisional structure (though fixing that won’t hurt). It’s the scheduling formula - and it’s horrible.
After the 2004-2005 lockout, the NHL realigned into its current two conference, six division structure. Initially, teams played division foes eight times, other conference rivals four times each, and 10 remaining games against two of the three divisions. In 2008-2009 hockey reduced the division games to six against each rival and added 8 games against the other conference to ensure every team played each other at least once. The initial realignment proposed to cut down on travel expenses - but for Columbus, this meant playing only playing 18 of its 82 games (22%) against opponents in the Eastern time zone. And when the league shifted to its current schedule format, Columbus did add eight Eastern time zone games bringing the total to 24 of 82 games (30%). And while the Jackets do now play 26 games (30%) of its games in the Central time zone compared to 32 games (40%) prior to the change, Columbus still plays 32 games (40%) against teams in the Mountain and Pacific time zones. For a team in Ohio, this is silly for television purposes, establishment of geographic rivals, fan away-game travel, and most important, general fan interest.
Traditional hockey cities and geographical rivals show up at Nationwide Arena once every two years while teams like the Sharks, Ducks, and Coyotes come to visit three times in a single season. Nothing against those cities out West, but most fans, and more specifically Ohio hockey fans, have little interest in seeing those teams. Ohio fans grew up around the Red Wings, Penguins, Sabres, and Maple Leafs, not the Disney-esque newbies on the other side of the country. They simply don’t see enough of what they would consider hockey teams they could relate to and establish a rooting interest for or against them. Apathy towards many Columbus opponents abounds. They rarely interact with fans other than Red Wings and Penguins fans, and they rarely play the Penguins!
Word is the NHL will be realigning around time zones, creating a larger 16-team Eastern Conference full of teams from the Eastern time zone while creating a 14-team Western Conference with teams from outside the Eastern time zone. Using the current formula, Columbus would only play 16 games (20%) against teams from the Mountain and Pacific time zones. Playing another 10 games (12%) against teams in the Central leaves the other 56 games (68%) to be played in the Eastern time zone. That feels right for a team from Ohio.
Mark Shapiro told the Plain Dealer and fans back in December that winning “is the simplest way to solve our ills. It will improve attendance and increase revenues, and we are working hard to put a winner on the field.” It’s hard to disagree with that sentiment. Win and they will come. But if winning isn’t the only way? What if simply demonstrating a commitment to putting a competitive product on the field could boost attendance. What if fans knew guys like Asdrubal Cabrera and Shin-Soo Choo would be around a few more years? This is where I call bullshit on the Indians.
Before I continue, a quick sidebar about correlation versus causation. Correlation does not suggest causation. Just because two numbers have a relationship does not mean that one number influences the other. Its a logical fallacy and has a fancy Latin name you can learn more about from Wikipedia. So as correlation increases toward 1, it doesn’t suggest that one number influences the other. It just suggests the strength of the correlation.
So, when looking at data regarding the correlation between wins, payroll, and attendance, I don’t mean to suggest causation in these relationships. Instead, I’m using this data to illustrate that potentially something other than winning might impact attendance - payroll.
Correlation of Wins, Attendance, and Payroll from 1985 - 2010
| Wins + Attendance | Payroll + Attendance | Payroll + Wins | |
| Indians | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.40 |
| MLB | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.48 |
Historical data for the Indians shows the relationship between payroll and attendance is very similar to the relationship between winning and attendance. Also interesting in the data is the lack of relationship between payroll and winning. So in that regard, the Indians play it smart. No point in throwing good money after bad. Spending money on the right guys is important and only hindsight suggests Cleveland’s investments in Travis Hafner and Grady Sizemore were mistakes. Given the economic trends at the time, those were considered bargains.
On its own, this data is helpful but insufficient in proving my assertion that Dolan’s unwillingness to invest in his own ballclub is the very reason he doesn’t have revenue to invest into his ballclub. But heading into 2012, the Indians only have two players under contract - Sizemore and Hafner. So back to Shapiro’s quote: “[Winning] will improve attendance and increase revenues, and we are working hard to put a winner on the field.” Maybe. But perhaps fans care about more than winning. The ballclub has invested in club seating, modern concessions, and all kind of other sideshow attractions born out of a marketing department working diligently to create the best game day experience possible. But something is missing from the gameday experience - the players themselves.
My advice to Tribe brass? Spend a little. Not like a drunken sailor on leave, but invest in a few guys. Give casual fans reasons to show up three or four times a year and season ticket holders confidence their money isn’t being spent on fake snow and an ice skating rink in the middle of December.
Jake Delhomme sucks. The Browns offense looks like a car spinning its wheels in the snow with him under center. Run up the middle with Hillis? It won’t work. Defense has nine in the box. Drop back and throw? The secondary can sit in a zone and wait for the underneath. All this energy expended. And we’re going nowhere.
For many Browns fans the clear cut choice to start at quarterback is Colt McCoy. I’m not so sure. This doesn’t mean Browns fans shouldn’t be excited about McCoy. He has the potential to be a very good quarterback and seems to have all the intangibles necessary to succeed in the NFL. But right now, he’s not much better than Seneca Wallace. But if a rookie can perform on-par with an established NFL veteran, then the Browns should be excited.
Overall, the quarterback play has been questionable for the Browns this season and likely the main reason the team is 5-7 and not 7-5 (however, this would require a different analysis). But Seneca Wallace should be the starting quarterback. He gives Cleveland the best chance to win. And Mangini’s insistence on playing Jake Delhomme can’t be rooted in anything more than giving the veteran quarterback a final shot. Let me explain.
Three statistical methods can be used to evaluate quarterback performance - the traditional NFL quarterback rating, a statistical method referred to in Wages of Wins, and another method developed by Wayne Winston in the book Mathletics. Editors Note: If you want to learn more about the specifics of those methods, I suggest you check out those books.
According to the numbers, Jake Delhomme shouldn’t not be allowed anywhere near the Browns offense and Wallace and McCoy are much closer in terms of performance than I think most believe.
First, its clear Delhomme under performs regardless of the analysis. So going forward, he isn’t even a consideration and Mangini should wise up and realize his indecision at quarterback (this should eerily familiar to both Derek Anderson and Brady Quinn) hurts the team.
Colt McCoy scores well because the Browns eat up more yardage when he plays quarterback. He simply does more with the same number of throws and avoids the catastrophic mistake. Wallace doesn’t generate the total yardage that McCoy generates, but on average, Wallace and McCoy deliver about 11-12 yards per completion and about 7 or so yards per pass attempt.
So, why start Wallace if you’re getting similar production from McCoy? He is a veteran. The plan was to keep McCoy on the sidelines. And while injuries pressed him into service far sooner than I think the Browns wanted, and while the results have been generally positive, McCoy remains a rookie. And we don’t want him hurt.
Cleveland heads down to New Orleans (9-1) and San Antonio (9-1), two of the hottest teams in the NBA. This might get ugly. The Cavs 5-5 record hasn’t exactly come against some of the NBA’s better teams. Removing the Celtics and Hawks games from consideration, the Cavs are just 4-4 against teams with a combined 20-45 record. This weekend will tell us a lot about this team.
Ohio State faces a no-win situation in Iowa City on Saturday. Iowa is a good team, but No. 20 in the BCS and 4-2 in the Big Ten. A win doesn’t necessarily boost the Buckeyes in the BCS standings and the Hawkeyes are very capable of beating the Buckeyes - especially at home. Plus, Ohio State doesn’t control their own destiny in the Big Ten. Buckeyes, tread carefully here.
The Browns, fresh from their stinging 26-20 OT loss to the Jets head to Florida to square off with the 5-4 Jaguars. The most notable matchup in this game pits Jacksonville’s porous defense (21.4% DVOA ranks 29 out of 32 teams) against the Browns offense is slightly above average (6.1% OVOA ranks 17 out of 32). If the Browns can make some plays in the passing game, they should return home with their third win in four games.
Cincinnati hosts the Bills in what can only be described as a desperation game for the Bengals. Losing to Buffalo at home might just be the game that ensures Marvin Lewis’s departure. Statistically, Cincinnati is much better than their record and should realistically be 5-4 or 4-5 if they could eliminate painful turnovers.
Columbus winds up a Western swing with at tough back-to-back at Anaheim(10-8-3, 23 pts) and San Jose (9-5-4, 22 pts). Columbus at 10-6-0 and 20 points has been a pleasant surprise so far this season, in order to keep pace in the Western Conference, the Jackets must take no less than two points this weekend.
The No. 4 Buckeye hoops hosts North Carolina Wilmington Saturday night. This team looks good so far this season. Let’s hope they can keep their edge after the big win at Florida earlier in the week.
The Browns plans for 2010 did not include McCoy. Simply put, Delhomme would start and Wallace would be the backup. The veterans would keep the quarterback seat warm while McCoy learned the nuances of the professional game. But injuries to both starters thrust McCoy into the spotlight and the rookie has played well in upset wins over New Orleans and New England. Even in a loss to Pittsburgh the rookie debutant looked poised and capable.
For those who draft professional football’s unwritten rules, the notion that a starter cannot lose his job to injury seems to be one of the more interesting debates this season. The Browns, along with the Eagles earlier in the season, have become ground zero for that discussion. But if the guy winning the job has no previous track record, and his body of work exceeds that of his predecessors and is not simply the byproduct of a hot streak, it might be possible the replacement is simply a better player. And should get the starting nod. This is the case with Colt.
Delhomme’s performance, not his injury, justifies benching. His four interceptions over six quarters matches the four interceptions both McCoy and Wallace have combined to throw in the other 30 quarters of Browns football. McCoy threw two in his debut in Pittsburgh and hasn’t thrown a pick since. Wallace had one each in a loss to Kansas City and a win over Cincinnati. In both games, Wallace’s QB rating was less than 80. Wallace did have QB ratings over 100 against both Baltimore and the second half against Atlanta. However, despite those promising performances, the Browns offense didn’t get it done. In the Atlanta game, Wallace’s pick was taken back for a score and essentially put the game to bed.
McCoy’s numbers have been slightly less impressive. But in his games, the Browns have gone 2-2 against some of the toughest defenses in the game - Pittsburgh, New England, and New York. His late-game drive against the Jets differentiates him from Wallace. He put the Browns on his back and drove them down the field for the tying TD. When he got the ball back in OT, he was taking them down for the winning score. Chansi Stuckey’s fumble prevented another win, but simply put, the Browns quarterback didn’t give the game away. Based on historical trends with Browns QBs that is enough to warrant continued reps as the starter.
Posts
I really need to write this post before I can determine how much of this I want to manage on my own. This should be an interesting journey as I share my experiences with Tableau Software and learn how to do really cool stuff with it.